In order to implement a secure managed file transfer system, you will need a good understanding of the supported services and protocols involved.

In order to implement a secure managed file transfer system, you will need a good understanding of the supported services and protocols involved.
This article provides an overview of the supported protocols, including the advantages and disadvantages of these protocols as well as situations for the use of these services.
The first part focuses on protocols that we recommend you reconsider in using and the rest of the article is followed by services that we do recommend.
The following, FTP and HTTP, are covered below as they both pose two services that offer the least advantage in terms of securing data and file transfers.
Shortform for File Transfer Protocol, the objectives of FTP are 1) to promote sharing of files (computer programs and/or data), 2) to encourage indirect or implicit (via programs) use of remote computers, 3) to shield a user from variations in file storage systems among hosts, and 4) to transfer data reliably and efficiently.
FTP has had a long evolution over many years starting with its beginnings published as RFC 114 on 16 April 1971. Over time there have been other forms of file transfer protocols made available as there had been vulnerabilities and weaknesses with FTP such as:
There are also limitations to the protocol. For example, there is no ability to encrypt data on transit. Data in transit can be sniffed using freely available tools since the transmissions of usernames, passwords, commands and other data is not encrypted. An attacker can run a packet sniffer over the network and sniff out FTP credentials. In addition, there is no integrity checking of files to ensure that data integrity remains since this is not included as a feature of the protocol.
There is a chance that your initial file transfer system may even be in FTP, depending on the age of the system. However, FTP has many security weaknesses and vulnerabilities as mentioned previously.
Those wishing to continue to use FTP and to do so in a secure manner may find themselves integrating other software to ensure security, creating additional scripts or taking on board additional maintenance. For example, there is no built-in integrity check however scripting work can be done to create a checksum integrity checking process and added at the end of a file transfer. There is also further additional overhead in ensuring that FTP remains secure such as integration with other applications for additional layers of security.
The FTP service is accessible by enabling the service and then configuring the address, port, passive port range, passive address, idle data connection timeout and more.
HTTP, shortform for Hypertext Transfer Protocol, is an application-level protocol for distributed, collaborative, hypermedia information systems. It is a generic, stateless, protocol which can be used for many tasks.
HTTP, in use by the World-Wide Web global initiative since 1990, is a protocol used in many tasks related to common usage of the web such as browsing websites. This is relevant to SFTPPlus since we offer a browser-based file management utility.
Without SSL/TLS, there is no way to encrypt data in transit. Other downsides to HTTP, in the context of SFTPPlus, include:
HTTP may be used internally within a highly secured network where there are already mechanisms in place to protect the environment.
We offer HTTP based micro-services and endpoints as part of our public API. In this case, the API is used in conjunction with other security mechanisms in place for the environment.
The HTTP service is accessible by enabling the service and then configuring the address, port, idle connection timeout and maximum concurrent connections.
The following are protocols and services that we do recommend for securing data and file transfers. This is not an exhaustive list.
FTPIS, or implicit FTPS, is the use of the FTP protocol where secure data transfer is invoked via SSL as soon as the connection starts or after the OK reply is sent by the server. In implicit mode, an FTPS client is expected to “immediately expected to challenge the FTPS server with a TLS ClientHello message. If such a message is not received by the FTPS server, the server should drop the connection.” This means that the use of SSL is implied. This is illustrated in the diagram above.
The advantage is that this service is safer than the use of the FTP protocol due to implementing SSL meaning that data transmission is encrypted.

Use FTPIS when you wish to use a more secure FTP for file transfer and where SSL does not need to be invoked prior to login. However, if possible, use FTPES as described further below.
In explicit mode, an FTPS client must “explicitly request” security from an FTPS server and then step up to a mutually agreed encryption method. If a client does not request security, the FTPS server can either allow the client to continue in insecure mode or refuse the connection.
The advantage is that this service is safer than the use of the FTP protocol due to implementing SSL. Prior to user connection, both the server and client must negotiate the level of security used.

Use FTPES when you wish to use a more secure FTP for file transfer and where SSL needs to be invoked prior to login. However it should be noted that this does not ensure that each and every session and data transfer is secure. FTPES is only a tool allowing the client/server to negotiate the accepted level of security with each session.
Since both are FTPS (FTP over TLS/SSL), they share some common advantages as listed, non-exhaustively, below:
SFTP is a network protocol that allows for file access, transfer and management capabilities over the SSH (Secure Shell) protocol channel.
The advantages for SFTP include:
The SFTP protocol follows a simple request-response model where each request and response contains a sequence number and multiple requests may be pending simultaneously.
The protocol assumes that both ends of the connection have been authenticated and that the connection has privacy and integrity features already in place and that security issues are left to the underlying transport protocol.
Since the protocol provides file system management feature, the server must have the correct access controls in place and implement correct authorization and enforce access controls.
In this case, when you implement SFTP ensure that you are doing so within an AAA (authorization, authentication, auditing/accounting) security design framework on SFTPPlus.
HTTPS, shortform for HTTP over TLS, provides security measures in using HTTP via SSL and its successor, TLS.
The HTTP protocol is further secured via SSL and its successor, TLS (Transport Layer Security), thus this is referred to as HTTPS. HTTPS provides end-to-end security for browser-based applications.
Other advantages to using HTTPS:
Since the SFTPPlus file management utility is accessible via the web browser, the HTTPS service is a more secure alternative compared to HTTP.
HTTPS is a must especially when the resource is going to be public (Internet) facing.
The HTTPS service is accessible by enabling the service and then configuring the SSL/TLS options such as the SSL cipher list, allowed SSL/TLS methods, SSL certificate, SSL key, certificate authority, certificate revocation list and more.
The application of one protocol over the other does not immediately guarantee security. Please consider these services merely as a layer within multiple others when implementing a secure managed file transfer solution.
Since features are constantly changed, we did not touch on any specifics within SFTPPlus. Please consult our documentation for the configuration and operations information, as well as practical users guides.
This resource is written as of SFTPPlus version 3.29.0.